Literatur zum Thema/ Bücher

Seikkula, J.; Arnkil, E. (2006)
Dialogical Meetings in Social Networks. London: Karnac Books
https://de1lib.org/book/2724476/f1e3e2?regionChanged=&redirect=199458066

Seikkula, J.; Arnkil, T. (2014)
Open dialogues and anticipations: respecting otherness in the present moment
http://opendialogueapproach.co.uk/product/open-dialogues-and-anticipations-respecting-otherness-in-the-present-moment-jaakko-seikkula-tom-erik-arnkil-paperback/

Ruzzaque, R. (2019)
Dialogical Psychiatry: A Handbook For The Teaching And Practice Of Open Dialogue. Omni House Press
https://www.amazon.com/Dialogical-Psychiatry-Handbook-Teaching-Practice/dp/1647136725?language=en_US

Reviews

Seikkula, J. (2015)
Open Dialogue with clients with mental health problems and their families. Context 138, 2–4
http://developingopendialogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Context138-Seikkula.pdf
Comprehensive description of the model concerning the 7 principles and 12 key elements and its practice.

Seikkula, J.; Alakare, B.; Aaltonen, J. (2001)
Open Dialogue in psychosis: I. An introduction and case illustration. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 247–265
http://jaakkoseikkula.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/joconstpsycholo2001I.pdf
As a social construct, our approach to work with severely disturbed psychiatric patients in crisis, termed Open Dialogue (OD), begins treatment within 24 hours of referral and includes the family and social network of the patient in discussions of all issues throughout treatment. Treatment is adapted to the specific and varying needs of patients and takes place at home, if possible. Psychological continuity and trust are emphasized by constructing integrated teams that include both inpatient and outpatient staff who focus on generating dialogue with the family and patients rather than rapid removal of psychotic symptoms. The main principles are described, and a case is analyzed to illustrate these.

Lakeman, R. (2014)
The Finnish Open Dialogue approach to crisis intervention in psychosis: a review. Psychotherapy in Australia, 20, 28
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268060536_The_Finnish_open_dialogue_approach_to_crisis_intervention_in_psychosis_A_review/link/546084600cf27487b450e52c/download
The open dialogue approach to crisis intervention is an adaptation of the Finnish need-adapted approach to psychosis that stresses flexibility, rapid response to crisis, family-centered therapy meetings, and individual therapy. Open dialogue reflects a way of working with networks by encouraging dialogue between the treatment team, the individual, and the wider social network. Findings indicate that in small cohorts of people in Western Lapland the duration of untreated psychosis has been reduced. Most people achieve functional recovery with minimal use of neuroleptic medication, have few residual symptoms, and are not in receipt of disability benefits at follow-up.

Gromer, J. (2012)
Need-adapted and Open-Dialogue treatments: empirically supported psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 162–177
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272139142_Need-Adapted_and_Open-Dialogue_Treatments_Empirically_Supported_Psychosocial_Interventions_for_Schizophrenia_and_Other_Psychotic_Disorders
Purpose: To provide people experiencing acute or severe psychosis with meaningful treatment choices, alternative approaches like need-adapted and open-dialogue interventions, developed in Finland, should be evaluated. This narrative review synthesizes findings from relevant outcome studies and shows that open-dialogue and need-adapted treatments had outcomes equivalent or superior to standard care. More research is needed before routine incorporation into U.S. practice.

Publication on the key elements

Olson, M.; Seikkula, J.; Ziedonis, D. (2014)
The Key Elements of Dialogic Practice in Open Dialogue: Fidelity Criteria. Worcester, MA, University Massachusetts Medical School
https://medschool.ucsd.edu/som/psychiatry/research/open-dialogue/Documents/keyelementsv1.109022014.pdf
A discussion of the twelve key elements of fidelity to Dialogic Practice that characterize the therapeutic, interactive style of Open Dialogue in face-to-face encounters within the treatment meeting.

Evaluation Studies on Psychosis

Seikkula, J.; Alakare, B.; Aaltonen, J.; et al. (2003)
Open Dialogue approach: treatment principles and preliminary results of a two-year follow up on first episode schizophrenia. Ethical and Human Sciences and Services, 5, 163–182
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233645426_Open_Dialogue_Approach_Treatment_Principles_and_Preliminary_Results_of_a_Two-Year_Follow-Up_on_First_Episode_Schizophrenia
The OD approach starts treatment within 24 hours of referral, includes the patient’s social network, and emphasizes dialogue rather than rapid symptom suppression. OD patients showed shorter hospitalizations, more family meetings, reduced neuroleptic use, fewer relapses, and better employment outcomes than comparison groups.

Seikkula, J.; Aaltonen, J.; Alakare, B.; et al. (2006)
Five-year experience of first-episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 214–228
https://openexcellence.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2006_Psychotherapy-Research_16_214-228.pdf
Historical comparison of OD outcomes showed fewer hospital days, reduced family meetings, and improved functional recovery. 82% of patients had no residual psychotic symptoms, 86% returned to work or studies, and 29% required neuroleptics at any phase.

Aaltonen, J.; Seikkula, J.; Lehtinen, K. (2011)
The comprehensive Open-Dialogue approach in Western Lapland: I. the incidence of nonaffective psychosis and prodromal states. Psychosis, 3, 179–191
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224873486_Seikkula_J_Alakare_B_Aaltonen_J_2011_The_comprehensive_open-dialogue_approach_II_Long-term_stability_of_acute_psychosis_outcomes_in_advanced_community_care_The_Western_Lapland_Project
Two-year follow-ups showed 81% of patients without residual symptoms, 84% returned to full-time work or studies, and only 33% used neuroleptics. Outcomes remained consistent over a 10-year observation period.

Seikkula, J.; Alakare, B.; Aaltonen, J. (2011)
The comprehensive Open-Dialogue approach in Western Lapland: II. long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis, 3, 192–204
https://www.erikbohlin.net/Articles/Open%20Dialogue/WesternLaplandProject11.pdf
Three inclusion periods of first-episode psychotic patients were followed up. Results showed consistent reduction in hospitalizations, low residual psychotic symptoms, and high reintegration into work or studies.

Bergström, T.; Alakare, B.; Aaltonen, J.; et al. (2017)
The long-term use of psychiatric services within the Open Dialogue treatment system after first-episode psychosis. Psychosis, 9, 310–321
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295?casa_token=yGbfxrts7bAAAAAA%3An3fS8DGY2AL9Yl4j7o9Eie1mDzQoopGqZlsA0soeSIc7JCykzCRAws_Hu-Al9SkJvsnpyq6ICIDSBw
Long-term follow-up (1992–2015, N=65) showed significant reductions in service use, hospitalizations, and treatment duration. Aggressive behavior at onset predicted longer hospitalization and treatment.

Bergström, T.; Seikkula, J.; Alakare, B.; Mäki, P.; Köngäs-Saviaro, P.; Taskila, J. J.; et al. (2018)
The family-oriented open dialogue approach in the treatment of first-episode psychosis: nineteen-year outcomes. Psychiatry Research, 270, 168–175
https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/59636/bergstromym1s2.0s0165178117323338main.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Long-term outcomes over 19 years showed lower hospitalizations, reduced disability allowances, and reduced neuroleptic use in OD patients compared to controls.

Bergström, T.; Taskila, J. J.; Alakare, B.; Köngäs-Saviaro, P.; Miettunen, J.; Seikkula, J. (2020)
Five-Year Cumulative Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication After First-Episode Psychosis and its Association With 19-Year Outcomes
https://academic.oup.com/schizbullopen/article/1/1/sgaa050/5904462
Higher cumulative antipsychotic exposure in the first 5 years correlated with higher psychiatric treatment, disability allowances, and mortality at 19-year follow-up.

Lehtinen, V.; Aaltonen, J.; Koffert, T.; et al. (2000)
Two-year outcome in first episode psychosis treated according to an integrated model: is immediate neuroleptisation always needed? European Psychiatry, 15, 312–320
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry/article/twoyear-outcome-in-firstepisode-psychosis-treated-according-to-an-integrated-model-is-immediate-neuroleptisation-always-needed/F35FA9766B333C420A47A4E315FA9355
42.9% of patients in the experimental group received no neuroleptics, showing equal or better outcomes than control.

Freeman, A. M.; Tribe, R. H.; Stott, J. C. H.; Pilling, S. (2019)
Open Dialogue: A Review of the Evidence. Psychiatric Services, 70, 46–59
https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ps.201800236
Review of 23 studies; quantitative evidence is low quality, qualitative studies show high risk of bias. Variation in models and outcome measures limits conclusions. Further RCTs are needed.

Seikkula, J. (2020)
From Research on Dialogical Practice to Dialogical Research: Open Dialogue Is Based on a Continuous Scientific Analysis. In: Ochs, M.; Borcsa, M.; Schweitzer, J. (eds), Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_9
Open Dialogue research has continuously informed clinical practice. Mixed-methods research evaluates outcomes, therapeutic processes, and the dialogical approach in everyday clinical settings.

Qualitative Evaluation Studies

Seikkula J (2001): Open Dialogue in psychosis: II. a comparison of good and poor outcome cases. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 14: 267–284
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10720530126129?needAccess=true
This paper examines 78 consecutive psychotic cases treated with the Open Dialogue approach, investigates the differences between cases with a good and a poor outcome, and signals some possible predictors of a poor outcome.

Seikkula J: (2002) Open dialogues with good and poor outcomes for psychotic crises: examples from families with violence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 28:263–274
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb01183.x
An analysis on the dialogical differences between cases with good and poor outcomes. In the good outcome cases, unlike in the poor outcome cases, since the first meeting the clients were heard and the team responded to their words in a dialogical way.

Publications for Implementation

Buus, N.; Bikic, A.; Jacobsen, E. K.; et al. (2017)
Adapting and implementing Open Dialogue in the Scandinavian countries: a scoping review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38, 391–401
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01612840.2016.1269377?needAccess=true
Scoping review of 33 publications on Open Dialogue adoption in Scandinavia. Highlights challenges in faithful implementation and describes OD as a promising mental health approach.

Brown, J. M.; Kurtti, M.; Haaraniemi, T.; Löhönen, E.; Vahtola, P. (2015)
A North–South Dialogue on Open Dialogues in Finland: The Challenges and the Resonances of Clinical Practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 51–68
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273523539_A_NorthSouth_Dialogue_on_Open_Dialogues_in_Finland_The_Challenges_and_the_Resonances_of_Clinical_Practice/link/5a9524d3aca272140567a6a8/download
Collaborative reflection on Finnish OD practice with Australian therapists. Core theme: mutual understanding in clinical practice; challenges and resonances discussed.

Ulland, D.; Andersen, A. J.; Larsen, I. B.; Seikkula, J. (2014)
Generating dialogical practices in mental health: experiences from southern Norway, 1998-2008. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 41(3), 410–419
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225889052.pdf
Examines three OD-based programs in Southern Norway. Emphasizes participatory implementation, collaboration with service users, and challenges to traditional medical therapy.

Razzaque, R.; Stockmann, T. (2016)
An introduction to peer-supported open dialogue in mental healthcare. BJPsych Advances, 22(5), 348–356
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-advances/article/an-introduction-to-peersupported-open-dialogue-in-mental-healthcare/E7A34021A8266DF280BD12FD2C0FAB8B
Describes peer-supported OD as enhancing democratic participation in meetings and facilitating care in fragmented networks.

Tribe, R. H. (2019)
Open dialogue in the UK: qualitative study. BJPsych Open, 5, e49, 1–7
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-open/article/open-dialogue-in-the-uk-qualitative-study/9400A61DC7AF33A4AFC24CB3D1FB4EA2
Qualitative study identifies themes in OD delivery, interaction intensity, and organizational challenges. Service user experiences were mostly positive, though some found reflective conversations distressing.

Gordon, C.; Gidugu, V.; Rogers, E. S.; et al. (2016)
Adapting Open Dialogue for early-onset psychosis into the US health care environment: a feasibility study. Psychiatric Services, 67, 1166–1168
https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ps.201600271
OD successfully integrated into a US outpatient/crisis program. Positive satisfaction among participants, families, and staff; barriers included training costs, insurance, and travel for home visits.

Olson, M. (2019)
The History of the Open Dialogue Approach in the United States
https://openexcellence.org/the-history-of-the-open-dialogue-approach-in-the-united-states/http://www.dialogicpractice.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Blog_Essay-for-Japan.pdf
Traces OD origins in Finland and US influences. Discusses US adoption through research studies, training programs, and the Institute for Dialogic Practice.

Parachute Project New York – White Paper
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mft0EP31FtmJgq5wHIe7i4bZ01JMoeeZ/view
Details development and implementation of Parachute NYC combining OD and Intentional Peer Support. Polyphonic presentation reflects dialogical approach.

Hopper, K.; Van Tiem, J.; Cubellis, L.; Pope, L. (2020)
Merging Intentional Peer Support and Dialogic Practice: Implementation Lessons From Parachute NYC. Psychiatric Services, 71(2), 199–201
https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ps.201900174
Implementation study shows peer-staffed teams improve collaboration, self-understanding, and flexibility in psychiatric crisis care; highlights challenges in structural constraints and sustainability.

Wusinich, C.; Lindy, D. C.; Russell, D.; et al. (2020)
Experiences of Parachute NYC: An Integration of Open Dialogue and Intentional Peer Support. Community Mental Health Journal, 56, 1033–1043
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10597-020-00556-0
Participants valued accessibility, relational focus, and peer integration. Mixed experiences regarding meeting structure and medication approach; overall improvement in relationships and self-understanding.

Von Peter, S.; Aderhold, V.; Cubellis, L.; Bergström, T.; Stastny, P.; Seikkula, J.; Puras, D. (2019)
Open Dialogue as a Human Rights-Aligned Approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 387
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00387
Conceptual article positioning OD as non-institutional, non-medicalizing, and aligned with human rights frameworks.

Schütze, W. (2015)
Open Dialogue as a contribution to a healthy society: possibilities and limitations. Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Elsevier
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278795270_Open_Dialogue_-_Possibilities_and_limitations_while_contributing_to_a_healthy_society
Explores OD implementation in Germany and Finland; addresses system-wide implications, stakeholder interests, and practical limitations of applying OD in public mental health.

Transformation of the professional identity

Holmesland A-L, Seikkula J, Nilsen O, et al (2010): Open Dialogues in social networks: professional identity and transdisciplinary collaboration. International Journal of Integrated Care 10:10
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948679/pdf/ijic2010-2010053.pdf
Methodology: Data was collected through three interviews conducted with two focus groups, the first comprising health care profes- sionals and the second professionals from the social and educational sectors. Content analysis was used to create categories through condensation and interpretation. The two main categories that emerged were ‘professional role’ and ‘teamwork’. These were analysed and compared according to the two first meeting in the two focus groups. 
Results and discussion: The results indicate different levels of motivation and understanding regarding role transformation processes. The realization of transdisciplinary collaboration is dependent upon the professionals’ mutual reliance. The professionals’ participation is affected by stereotypes and differences in their sense of belonging to a certain network, and thus their identity transformation seems to be strongly affected. To encourage the use of integrated solutions in mental health care, the professionals’ preference for teamwork, the importance of familiarity with each other and knowledge of cultural barriers should be addressed.

Holmesland A-L (2015) Professionals’ Experiences with Open Dialogues with Young People’s Social Networks – Identity, Role and Teamwork A Qualitative Study  Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2015, 73 p.
http://www.abup.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Avhandling-Anne-Lise-Holmesland.pdf
This research explored the experiences of professionals participating in network meetings in the context of Open Dialogue. The professionals participated in a clinical pilot project, Project Joint Development, which was carried out in southern Norway in the period 2003-2005. The professionals were working across the boundaries of the health, social and educational sectors. The three studies reported on in this research focused on the emergence of professional identity in multi-agency teamwork, a professional role involving the adoption of a transdisciplinary role and aspects of dialogue. The data consisted of interviews conducted with two focus groups, the first comprising healthcare professionals and the second professionals from the social and educational sectors. The two groups met three times. Observations and audiotapes of network meetings were also included, in addition to the presentation of an innovative case. The data from the focus groups were analysed by means of content analysis. The findings from the studies suggest the following: (i) professionals are able to develop a transdisciplinary identity involving change in their professional role and understanding of teamwork; (ii) the professionals’ ability to generate dialogue, including the ability and willingness to listen to others and provide authentic feedback, may be a challenge; (iii) other professionals than trained therapists may be able to integrate skills and knowledge related to an Open Dialogue and thus develop their role in a more therapeutic direction; (iv) professionals adapt to each other in network meetings by dwelling on the same topics and adapting their utterances to what was previously said. To increase collaboration between professions and agencies, a unified definition and understanding of the different modes of collaboration, as well as a clear role understanding, should be emphasized. The different expectations that the various actors might have should be focused on and aspects such as the professionals’ motivation to collaborate and participate in joint dialogues should be explored.

Borchers, P., Seikkula, J., & Lehtinen, K. (2014). Psychosis, Need Adapted treatment, and psychiatrists’ agency. Psychosis 6: 27–37
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17522439.2012.755218?needAccess=true
Methods: Using videos of co-research interviews, stimulated-recall interviews of 10 interviewees were conducted and transcribed verbatim. The material was analyzed via an adapted dialogical-narrative analytical method. Results: Institutional forces were experienced as having an enormous impact on psychiatrists’ agency, especially in the inpatient setting, reducing professional creativity. In the outpatient setting, psychiatrists who also attended hospital care were the most able to follow the principles of NAA. Those who only took part in outpatient treatment tended to adopt the position of medical consultants. Conclusions: The ability of psychiatrists to have agency in the language used with the clients is an underrated issue. The interview methods used in the research could be utilized in practice.

Borchers, P., Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2014). The Need Adapted Approach in psychosis: The impact of psychosis on the treatment, and professionals. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry 16: 5–19.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264938390_The_Need Adapted_Approach_in_Psychosis_The_Impact_of_Psychosis_on_the_Treatment_and_the_Professionals
Psychosis is a challenging phenomenon for professionals. In the need-adapted approach (NAA), therapy meetings constitute a deliberate effort to meet the challenges by bringing all the main parties together within a common discussion. The aims of this study are to analyze and evaluate psychiatrists’ experiences of the treatment processes in psychosis. A qualitative multiple case study approach has been used. Between August 2007 and January 2009, co-research interviews (CR-Is) and stimulated-recall interviews (STR-Is) with 10 psychiatrists from 3 different parts of Finland were videoed and transcribed verbatim. The material was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The difficult emotions of the professionals and the critical views expressed had a prominent role. It was almost impossible to proceed with the treatment until the memories of coercive acts had been addressed. There were fewer harmful effects in outpatient than in inpatient care. If the client-centered principles of NAA were not followed, the CR-Is functioned primarily as critical evaluations of the treatment processes. The STR-Is helped the psychiatrists to find words for difficult experiences. For the sake of both practice and research, the experiences of staff in the treatment of psychosis should be taken into account. For better prediction of failure, routine measures to obtain feedback could be included in NAA.

Borchers, P. (2014) „Issues like this have an impact“: the need-adapted treatment of psychosis and the psychiatrist’s inner dialogue.” Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research (2014): n. pa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/44396/978-951-39-5861-9_vaitos25102014.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
This research aimed to describe the inner dialogues of psychiatrists in the context of the Need-Adapted treatment of psychosis. It strived to show that the experiences of professionals can have an impact on the treatments offered. In addition, the research aimed to clarify how the phenomenon of professionals’ inner dialogues may be studied.  The data for the three studies of the research consisted of eight videotaped and transcribed stimulated recall interviews with psychiatrists, who recalled their inner dialogues, assisted by videos from co-research interviews. The dia- logues took place in multi-agent discussions with patients, with the family members of patients, and with other professionals. The first study provided an overall picture of the research material, with a focus on psychiatrists’ inner dia- logues concerning their workmates. The second study focused on how the psychiatrists viewed their agency. The third study dealt with the impact of psychosis on the treatment, the psychiatrists, and other professionals. The first two studies used adaptations of dialogical-narrative analysis, while the third study used an adaptation of qualitative content analysis. From the perspective of real-world clinical practice the studies suggested the following: (i) since psychiatrists interact with the clients and with other professionals, they respond as embodied individual human beings with possibly strong emotions; this suggests that the experiences and inner dialogues of the participants may be interdependent; (ii) clinician-clinician relationships can be of crucial importance in the treatment; (iii) especially in the inpatient setting, institutional forces can have an enormous impact on psychiatrists’ agency by reducing professional creativity, and occasionally, by leading to a kind of agent- less situation; (iv) psychiatrists seem to be more or less aware of the many harmful effects of (in particular) inpatient treatment; (v) the interview methods used in the research increased professionals’ reflective opportunities, indicating that such interviews could be helpful in the dilemmas professionals encounter in practice.

Olson M. (2015) An Auto-Ethnographic Study of „Open Dialogue“: The Illumination of Snow. Fam Process. 54(4):716-29.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279731476_An_Auto-Ethnographic_Study_of_Open_Dialogue_The_Illumination_of_Snow
This auto-ethnographic study describes the changes in the author’s thinking and clinical work connected to her first-hand experience of Open Dialogue, which is an innovative, psychosocial approach to severe psychiatric crises developed in Tornio, Finland. In charting this trajectory, there is an emphasis on three interrelated themes: the micropolitics of U.S. managed mental health care; the practice of „dialogicality“ in Open Dialogue; and the historical, cultural, and scientific shifts that are encouraging the adaptation of Open Dialogue in the United States. The work of Gregory Bateson provides a conceptual framework that makes sense of the author’s experience and the larger trends. The study portrays and underscores how family and network practices are essential to responding to psychiatric crises and should not be abandoned in favor of a reductionist, biomedical model

Valtanen K. (2019) The Psychiatrist’s Role in Implementing an Open Dialogue Model of Care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 40, 319–329
https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1382
In daily work, the responsibility for the treatment process is shared with the case-specific team. The model of care requires a dialogical orientation from all staff members, psychiatrists included, to interact with the team and the client’s network. In this article I describe the role of the psychiatrist in implementing an Open Dialogue model of care in psychiatric services leaning on my experiences of clinical work in the adolescent psychiatric team in Western Lapland.

Schubert S., Rhodes P., Buus N. (2021) Transformation of professional identity: an exploration of psychologists and psychiatrists implementing Open Dialogue. Journal of Family Therapy 43(1):143-16
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-6427.12289
First, two general pre-existing discursive professional identity positions were constructed: (i) psychiatrists rhetorically distancing themselves from the medical model as ‘fixers’ of mental illness; and (ii) psychologists and psychiatrists rhetorically embracing their personal identity. Second, participants’ responses about implementing Open Dialogue revealed opportunities and discomforts, including: (i) dialogical approaches offering psychiatrists an alternative identity to ‘fixers’; and (ii) dialogical approaches generating discomfort at the risk of exposing participants’ own vulnerability. Participants’ professional identities comprised contrasting positions.

Publications Training in Open Dialogue Cubellis L. (2020) Sympathetic care, Cultural Anthropology 35 (1) 14-22
https://journal.culanth.org/index.php/ca/article/download/4434/497?inline=1
German clinicians working with psychiatric crises employ an alternative therapy called Open Dialogue to excavate the family histories and interpersonal relationships of their clients. In learning to do this, they perform roleplay exercises in which familial narratives are imagined and improvised. Through this process, they develop an embodied practice in which they attune to misalignments in the network through words.

Publications Training in Open Dialogue

Cubellis L. (2020) Sympathetic care, Cultural Anthropology 35 (1) 14-22
https://journal.culanth.org/index.php/ca/article/download/4434/497?inline=1
German clinicians working with psychiatric crises employ an alternative therapy called Open Dialogue to excavate the family histories and interpersonal relationships of their clients. In learning to do this, they perform roleplay exercises in which familial narratives are imagined and improvised. Through this process, they develop an embodied practice in which they attune to misalignments in the network through words.

Publications on various Aspects of the Dialogical Approach

Open dialogue around the world implementation, outcomes, experiences and perspectives Frontiers 2023
https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/29062/open-dialogue-around-the-world—implementation-outcomes-experiences-and-perspectives/magazine?page=2

Seikkula, J. (2011) Becoming Dialogical: Psychotherapy or a Way of Life? The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 32(3), 179-193
http://developingopendialogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Seikkula-Becoming-Dialogical-2011.pdf
After birth the first thing we learn is becoming a participant in dialogue.We are born in relations and those relations become our structure. Intersubjectivity is the basis of human experience and dialogue the way we live it. In this paper the dilemma of looking at dialogue as either a way of life or a therapeutic method is described.The background is the open dialogue psychiatric system that was initi- ated in Finnish Western Lapland. The author was part of the team re-organizing psychiatry and afterwards became involved in many different types of projects in dialogical practices. Lately the focus has shifted from looking at speech to seeing the entire embodied human being in the present moment, especially in multifarious settings. Referring to studies on good outcomes in acute psychosis, the contribu- tion of dialogical practice as a psychological resource will be clarified.

Seikkula, J.; Olson, M. (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Family Process , 42(3), 403-418
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227607985_The_Open_Dialogue_Approach_to_Acute_Psychosis_Its_Poetics_and_Micropolitics
In Finland, a networkbased, language approach to psychiatric care has emerged, called “Open Dialogue.” It draws on Bakhtin’s dialogical principles (Bakhtin, 1984) and is rooted in a Batesonian tradition. Two levels of analysis, the poetics and the micropolitics, are presented. The poetics include three principles: “tolerance of uncertainly,”“dialogism,” and “polyphony in social networks.” A treatment meeting shows how these poetics operate to generate a therapeutic a therapeutic dialogue. The micropolitics are the larger institutional practices that support this way of working and are part of Finnish NeedAdapted Treatment, Recent research suggests that Open Dialogue has improved outcomes for young people in a variety of acute, severe psychiatric crises, such as psychosis, as compared to treatment asusual settings. In a nonrandomized, 2year follow up of firstepisode schizophrenia, hospitalization decreased to approximately 19 days; neuroleptic medication was needed in 35% of cases; 82% had no, or only mild psychotic symptoms remaining; and only 23% were on disability allowance.

Seikkula, J. (2008) Inner and outer voices in the present moment of family and network therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 30(4), 478–491

http://www.verbindendsprekenmetpsychose.com/uploads/5/8/2/0/58208449/seikkula__inner_and_outer_voices_in_the_present_moment_of_family_and_network_therapy.pdf
Every conversational situation is lived in two simultaneous histories, namely in the one lived and in the one storied. Especially if we want to focus on generating dialogue as the primary form of psychotherapy, the importance of the polyphony of the voices becomes evident compared, for instance, to systemic family therapy that focuses on elements of family structure or family rules. In every form of psychotherapy dialogue is important, but often dialogue is regarded as a form of communication. That is one aspect of dialogue, but in this paper it is seen as the basic way of engaging with others actually and virtually in the way that forms the mind. Mind is not seen as an independent element of human psychological structure, but an ongoing process from one second to another between living persons. Dialogue is communication, but it is also the relation and process of forming oneself.

Rober P. (2005) Family therapy as a dialogue of living persons: a perspective inspired by Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and Shotter. J Marital Fam Ther. 31(4):385-97. 
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01578.x
There are not a lot of conceptual tools that can help a family therapy teacher to talk and teach about the importance of the therapeutic relationship in family therapy practice. The idea that family therapy can be conceived as a dialogue might offer a fresh and promising perspective. Mainly inspired by the work of Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and Shotter, the author considers if the concept of dialogue can help us to talk about something that is there all the time in our family therapeutic practices, although sometimes unnoticed, and that is hard to talk about because we lack the necessary conceptual tools. When we choose to conceptualize family therapy as dialogue, the focus of the therapist is not primarily on data collection, information processing or problem analysis. The therapist is not primarily concerned with knowing, or with not-knowing. Instead, the focus is on the idea that first and foremost therapy is a meeting of living persons, searching to find ways to share life together for a while. Clinical vignettes that feature children’s drawings in family therapy are used as illustrations.

Rober P. (2011) The therapist’s experiencing in family therapy practice. Journal of Family Therapy (2011) 33: 233–255
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00502.x
The question posed in this article is how the therapist should deal with strong emotions she might experience in the session. This question is especially important if it concerns emotions that –at least on the surface‐ cannot be considered to contribute to a therapeutic alliance. We offer some reflections as preliminary steps towards answering this question and propose that therapists be sensitive to their own experiencing during the session, be careful to monitor the implicit invitations to join the family members in potentially destructive relational scenarios, reflect on the possible negative and perpetuating effects of her interactions with the family, and explore opportunities to proceed with the session in new and more constructive ways. In our approach the therapist’s experiencing is seen as a tool that may be used to further the therapeutic process. This is consonant with the view of family therapists exploring the importance for the therapist of holding open a space of reflection, while it also fits with a dialogical approach to family therapy, in which the therapist’s task may be described as listening to the stories the clients tell, and making room for other stories that have not been told before. Two case discussions illustrate our ideas.

Inner Dialogues of Therapists

Rober P. (1999) The therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy practice: some ideas about the self of the therapist, therapeutic impasse, and the process of reflection. Fam Process. 38(2):209-28
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00209.x
In this article, a distinction is made between the outer therapeutic conversation and the therapist’s inner conversation. The therapeutic conversation is a circle of meaning in which both the therapist and the clients play a part. The therapist’s inner conversation is described as a negotiation between the self of the therapist and his role. In this process of negotiation the therapist has to take seriously, not only his observations, but also what is evoked in him by these observations, that is, images, moods, emotions, associations, memories, and so on. Furthermore, therapeutic impasse is conceptualized as a paralysis of the circle of meaning and of the therapist’s inner conversation. A process of reflection is proposed as a way out of the impasse. In that process, the inner conversation of the therapist is externalized with the help of an outsider. In the final part of this article, a case study illustrates the importance of these ideas for the family therapy practice.

Rober P (2005) The therapist’s self in dialogical family therapy: some ideas about not-knowing and the therapist’s inner conversation. Fam Process 44(4): 477-95
http://users.skynet.be/bs130511/The%20Therapist’s%20Self%20(Family%20Process).pdf
In this article, the focus is on the therapist’s self, which will be in line with Bakhtin’s thinking, viewed as a dialogical self. First, the dialogical view of the self is situated in the context of psychology’s traditional focus on the individual self. Then, leaning on Bakhtin and Volosinov, the self is described as a dialogue of multiple inner voices. Some of the implications of this concept for family therapy practice are examined, fo- cusing especially on the therapist’s participation in the therapeutic process and on the therapist’s inner conversation. The author argues that not-knowing does not only refer to the therapist’s receptivity and respect but also implies that the therapist is aware of his or her experience and reflects on how his or her inner conversation might inform and enrich the therapeutic conversation. Finally, these ideas are illustrated with a brief clinical vignette.

Rober P, Elliott R, Buysse A, Loots G, De Corte K. (2008) What’s on the therapist’s mind? A grounded theory analysis of family therapist reflections during individual therapy sessions. Psychother Res.18(1):48-57.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10503300701324183?needAccess=true
The authors used a videotape-assisted recall procedure to study the content of family therapists’ inner conversations during individual sessions with a standardized client. Grounded theory was used to analyze therapists’ reflections, resulting in a taxonomy of 282 different codes in a hierarchical tree structure of six levels, organized into four general domains: attending to client process; processing the client’s story; focusing on therapists’ own experience; and managing the therapeutic process. In addition to providing a descriptive model of therapists’ inner conversation, this research led to an appreciation of the wealth of therapists’ inner conversation. In particular, the authors found that therapists work hard to create an intersubjective space within which to talk by trying to be in tune with their clients and by using clients as a guide.

Borchers, P., Seikkula, J., Lehtinen, K. (2013): Psychiatrists’ inner dialogues concerning workmates during Need Adapted treatment of psychosis. Psychosis 5: 60-70
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254348690_Psychiatrists’_inner_dialogues_concerning_workmates_during_need_adapted_treatment_of_psychosis
M
ethods: Using videos of co-research interviews, stimulated-recall interviews with eight psychiatrists were conducted and transcribed verbatim. The material was analyzed using an adapted form of dialogical analysis, focusing on voices and positioning.
Results: The psychiatrists took actions in the treatment situation not only as professionals, but also as individuals who had their own characteristics, and individual relationships with their co-workers.

Conclusions: Professionals as individuals, and the quality of clinician-clinician relationships, have an impact on treatment. These aspects should be taken into account in practice, in education, and in future research.

Lidbom PA, Bøe TD, Kristoffersen K, et al (2014): A study of a network meeting: exploring the interplay between inner and outer dialogues in significant and meaningful moments. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 35:136–149
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1052
The present study is part of a series of qualitative studies focusing on dialogic practice in southern Norway. In this article, we present a qualitative study of a network meeting focusing on the interplay between the participants‘ inner and outer dialogues. The network meeting is between an adolescent boy, his mother and two network therapists, the same adolescent case discussed previously in this journal by Bøe et al. (2013). The aim of this study is to explore how the interplay between inner and outer dialogues contributes to significant and meaningful moments for the interlocutors. A multiperspective methodology is used that combines video recordings of a network meeting and participant interviews with text analysis. Our research found the interplay has an important role in understanding the emergence of significant and meaningful moments in therapy. A onesided focus on participants‘ utterances or inner dialogues was insufficient to explain their significance and meaning to the interlocutors. A dialogical approach provides a theoretical frame and concepts that are useful in investigations of therapeutic conversations.

Frediani G, Rober P. (2016) What Novice Family Therapists Experience During a Session… A Qualitative Study of Novice Therapists‘ Inner Conversations During the Session. J Marital Fam Ther. 42(3):481-94. 
https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmft.12149
„What do novice family therapists experience during a session with a couple or family?“ This is the central question in this article. A videotape-assisted recall procedure was used to study novice family therapists‘ inner conversations. The therapists‘ reflections were analyzed using thematic analysis. This resulted in a coding system that distinguishes four main domains: (a) reflections concerning the self; (b) reflections about the therapy process; (c) reflections on emotions about the family members; and (d) managing the session as well as own emotions. The study furthermore revealed that during a session, novice family therapists experience strong emotions, such as self-criticism and irritation. Both emotions may encompass dangers, as well as opportunities for the therapeutic alliance and the process.

How Changes Happen

Seikkula, J.; Trimble, D. (2005) Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Family Process 44(4): 461–475
http://apopendialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/seikkula-HealingElementsofTherapeuticConver.pdf
From our Bakhtinian perspective, understanding requires an active process of talking and listening. Dialogue is a precondition for positive change in any form of therapy. Using the perspectives of dialogism and neurobiological development, we analyze the basic elements of dialogue, seeking to understand why dialogue becomes a healing experience in a network meeting. From the perspective of therapist as dialogical partner, we examine actions that support dialogue in conversation, shared emotional experience, creation of community, and creation of new shared language. We describe how feelings of love, manifesting powerful mutual emotional attunement in the conversation, signal moments of therapeutic change.

Seikkula J, Laitila A, Rober P. (2012) Making sense of multi-actor dialogues in family therapy and network meetings. J Marital Fam Ther. 38(4):667-87.
http://www.fundacioninterfas.org/capacitacion/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Seikkula-Makingsense.pdf
In this article, we propose some preliminary ideas concerning qualitative investigations of multi-actor dialogues. Our aim is to work toward an integration of Bakhtin’s theoretical concepts with good practices in qualitative research (e.g., dialogical tools and concepts of a narrative processes coding system) in order to make sense of family therapy dialogues. A specific method that we have called Dialogical Methods for Investigations of Happening of Change is described. This method allows for a general categorization of the qualities of responsive dialogues in a single session, and also for a detailed focus on particular sequences through a microanalysis of specific topical episodes. The particular focus is on the voices present in the utterances, the positioning of each speaker, and the addressees of the utterances. The method is illustrated via an analysis of a couple therapy session with a depressed woman and her husband.

Shotter, J., Katz, A. (1998) ‘Living Moments in Dialogical Exchanges’. Human Systems 9(2), 81- 93
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238767356_’Living_moments’_in_dialogical_exchanges/link/5523cdcc0cf2c815e0732685/download
This article explores Tom Andersen’s emphasis on the significance of particular “arresting,” “moving,” “living,” or “poetic moments” that arise within therapeutic dialogues. The authors interpret his work as an example of what John Shotter and Aron Katz have described as a practice of social poetics. Rather than aiming to produce a universal, purely cognitive explanation of such moments—one that claims to uncover their essential nature—social poetics encourages a different orientation. It invites us to engage more attentively with the unfolding, dynamic “play” of unique events as they occur in real conversations, and to participate in them rather than stand outside them as detached observers.
From this perspective, meaning is not fixed or pre-given but emerges through the ongoing creation of connections between events within the interaction itself. It is through this continuous linking, in practice, that participants in a dialogue come to reveal both themselves and their lived worlds to one another. These fleeting yet vital moments of interaction open up space for genuinely new possibilities. In such “living moments,” people do not simply analyze or intellectually solve their problems; instead, they begin to enact and experience solutions within the flow of their interactions—solutions that could not be reached through abstract reflection alone.
To deepen this exploration, the article draws on the philosophical contributions of Gaston Bachelard, Mikhail Bakhtin, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, whose ideas help illuminate the fluid, relational, and emergent nature of meaning in human encounters. As Andersen himself suggests, the kind of life therapists are most concerned with consists of meanings and feelings that are constantly shifting—present for a brief moment and gone the next—highlighting the importance of attending to these transient yet transformative instances within therapeutic practice.

Shotter, J. (2003) Cartesian change, chiasmic change: The power of living expression. Janus Head 6, 6–29
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253661331_Cartesian_Change_Chiasmic_Change_The_Power_of_Living_Expression/link/5523cdcc0cf24f1609437864/download
Thus, rather than merely gaining a sense of that reality over there from a set of pictures that we might view in an art gallery without ever going out into the actual world at large, the nonvisual dynamical patterns that we can come to embody, in following Wittgenstein’s methods, can help us in actual fact to come to be more ‘at home’ in our own human world.

Lidbom PA, Bøe TD, Kristoffersen K, et al (2015): How participants’ inner dialogues contribute to significant and meaningful moments in network therapy with adolescents. Contemporary Family Therapy 37:122–129
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10591-015-9331-0
Abstract As a part of a larger research project, this qualitative study explores the interplay between an outer dialogue and participants’ inner dialogues in network therapy with adolescents in the mental  healthcare system for children and adolescents. The aim of this study is to explore how the participants’ inner dialogues contribute to significant and meaningful moments in the therapeutic meeting. A multiperspective methodology is used that combines video recordings of network therapy sessions and participants’ interviews with text analysis. Our research found that the participants’ inner dialogues are essential in the development of significant and meaningful moments during a therapeutic conversation. We also found that one of the main reasons that inner dialogues are essential in the emergence of such moments is that they contain many different movements, both in time and between positions

Bøe TD, Kristoffersen K, Lidbom PA, et al (2013): Change is an ongoing ethical event: Levinas, Bakhtin and the dialogical dynamics of  becoming. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 34:18–31
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264606303_Change_is_an_Ongoing_Ethical_Event_Levinas_Bakhtin_and_the_Dialogical_Dynamics_of_Becoming/link/5a4995f4458515f6b058cb20/download
In this article, we use the intersubjective ethics of Bakhtin and Levinas and a case illustration to explore change in therapy as an ethical phenomenon. We follow Lakoff and Johnson in their emphasis on the way our conceptions of change seem permeated by metaphors. Bakhtin and Levinas both suggest through a language in which metaphors play a crucial role, that human existence—the consciousness and the subject—emerge within the dialogue of the encounter. They both describe the dynamics of human existence as ethical in their origin. Following this, we argue that change may be seen as an ongoing ethical event and that the dynamics of change are found in the ways we constantly become in this event. We investigate the ethical dynamics of this ongoing event through three themes illuminating the contributions of both Bakhtin and Levinas: (1) we become as responsible, (2) we become in speaking, (3) we become in answering the unknown. We explore these themes through a case illustration. Finally, we briefly point out some possible implications for mental health practice.

Bøe TD, Kristoffersen K, Lidbom PA, et al (2014): “She offered me a place and a future”: change is an event of becoming through movement in ethical time and space. Contemporary Family Therapy 36: 474–484
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10591-014-9317-3#citeas
The aim of this study was to explore the social dynamics of change related to adolescents in psychosocial crises. From the perspective of lived experience the study focused changes related to the adolescents’ ways of existing in various social arenas. Data from qualitative interviews with adolescents receiving help from a mental health service, persons in their social network, and the practitioners involved were explored through a dialogical phenomenological–hermeneutical process. Two co-researchers, on the basis of their own experience with mental health problems, participated throughout the research process. Concepts from the thinking of Mikhail Bakhtin, Françoise Dastur, and John Shotter were used as interpretative help. Main theme: change is the event of becoming through movement in Ethical Time and Space. Two dimensions, conceptualized as Ethical Space and Ethical Time, were identified: (1) “A place for me” or “No place for me” (Ethical Space), and (2) Before-Event of anticipation—Event of movement—After-Event of experience (Ethical Time). Four aspects within these dimensions emerged: (1) an opening Before-Event: offering space for my movement; (2) a closing Before-Event: not offering space for my movement; (3) a life-giving After-Event: the experience of being valued; and (4) a life-deteriorating After-Event: the experience of being devalued. The results are discussed in relation to other studies investigating how bodily responsiveness is at the core of human becoming.

Bøe TD, Kristoffersen K, Lidbom PA, et al (2015): “Through speaking, he finds himself… a bit”: dialogues open for moving and living through inviting attentiveness, expressive vitality and new meaning. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 36: 167–187
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273672950_’Through_speaking_he_finds_himself_a_bit’_Dialogues_Open_for_Moving_and_Living_through_Inviting_Attentiveness_Expressive_Vitality_and_New_Meaning
The present study is part of a series of qualitative studies from southern Norway, exploring dialogical practices and change from the perspective of lived experience and in relationship with network meetings. Two co-researchers, who themselves had experienced mental health difficulties, were part of the research team. Material from qualitative interviews was analysed through a dialogical hermeneutical process where ideas from Emmanuel Levinas and Mikhail Bakhtin were used as analytical lenses. Six interdependent dimensions emerged from our interpretative analysis, comprising three temporal dimensions (1. Dialogues open the moment, 2. Dialogues open the past, and 3. Dialogues open the future) and three dimensions of speaking, which operated across the three temporal dimensions (4. Ethical: Dialogues open through inviting attentiveness and valuing, 5. Expressive: Dialogues open for new vitality, and 6. Hermeneutical: Dialogues open for new meaning). These dimensions were incorporated into one main theme: Dialogues – beginning by others being invitingly attentive – open for moving and living. The way the findings point to change events as an opening for movement – ‚moving in‘ as if from the outside, and ‚moving on‘ as opposed to being stuck – are discussed in relation to other studies. We conclude by suggesting that the salient point of change-generating conversations is in the ethics of being invitingly attentive, and such conversations should take into account multidimensionality, that relates to the past and the future.

Holmesland A-L, Seikkula J, Hopfenbeck M (2014): Inter-agency work in Open Dialogue: the significance of listening and authenticity. Journal of Interprofessional Care 28:433–439, 2014
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261325469_Interagency_work_in_Open_Dialogue_the_significance_of_listening_and_authenticity
The article explores what professionals regard as important skills and attitudes for generating inter-agency network meetings involving intra- and interprofessonal work. More specifically, we will examine what they understand as promoting or impeding dialogue and how this is related to their professional backgrounds. The professionals participated in a project using an open dialogue approach in order to increase the use of inter-agency network meetings with young people suffering from mental health problems. In this explorative case study, empirical data was collected through interviews conducted with two focus groups, the first comprising healthcare professionals and the second professionals from the social and educational sectors. Content analysis was used, where the main category that emerged was dialogue. To illustrate the findings achieved in the focus groups, observations of inter-agency network meetings are included. The findings describe the significance and challenges of listening and authenticity in the professionals‘ reflections. The healthcare workers expressed worries concerning their capacities for open and transparent dialogues, while the other professionals‘ emphasized the usefulness of particular techniques. Inter-agency network meetings may be improved if more awareness is placed on the significance of meeting atmosphere, dwelling on specific topics, dealing with silence and understanding how authentic self-disclosure in reflections can promote the personal growth of the participants.

Piippo J, Aaltonen J (2008): Mental health care: trust and mistrust in different caring contexts. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17: 2867–2874
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02270.x
Results: Three categories creating trust were found in the Integrated Network and Family Model and two in the Traditional context. Acceptance of the patient’s expertise concerning his/her life situation, openness and joint discussions concerning knowledge are important. Trust is closely connected to autonomy and power: patients feel that trust increases as their experience of autonomy increases and in such situations power is not owned by any one person.
Conclusions: Trust between psychiatric patients and personnel can be created in both the Integrated Network and Family Model and traditional context, but in different ways. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinical workers and nursing personnel can use our findings in their practical work with psychiatric patients. Our findings support theoretical considerations concerning trust and can be used as guidelines for nursing personnel in their work.

Piippo J, Aaltonen J (2004): Mental health: integrated network and family-oriented model for co-operation between mental health patients, adult mental health services and social services. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13:876–885
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00958.x
Results: The findings indicate the importance of the participation of patients and their social networks in psychiatric care or the treatment process. Meetings should be characterized by open and reflexive discussions with all participants’ points of view being included, so that fruitful co-operation is possible. However, some negative experiences were also reported, all of which were connected with the professionals’ behaviour.
Conclusions: Trust and honesty are essential elements in relations between professionals and psychiatric patients, but it cannot be assumed that they will develop naturally. It is the professionals’ responsibility to adjust their behaviour so that these elements can be created in a mutual process between patients and professionals. Multidisciplinary teams are a necessity in family-oriented co-operation between psychiatry and social services, and in a satisfactory caring process. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses’ work is often individually oriented and nurses are ruled by routines in their work. The mental health caring process should be seen as a shared process between the patient, his/her human environment and professionals for which nurses need skills to their interaction with patients and their social network.

Marlowe NI (2015) Open Dialogue with RD Laing. Psychosis 7:272–275
https://macquariestreetpsychology.com.au/open-dialogue-and-the-divided-self/
Conclusions: Notwithstanding the methodological challenges, when the theoretical interfaces between the works of Seikkula and Laing are examined, a programme of research emerges with the potential to generate synergistic effects on both sides. Moreover, the therapeutic structure of OD appears well suited to the empirical task that Laing was unable to undertake: The exploration of the inter-relations between ontological insecurity, invalidating interpersonal contexts, psychosis, dialogue, validating therapeutic relationships and recovery. It is anticipated that research in the directions indicated may contribute to the further development of a comprehensive psychological theory of psychosis, grounded in the lived experience of the individual, as well as to the emergence of more innovative and effective methods of psychotherapy.

Various Other Topics Qualitative Research

Nach oben scrollen
WordPress Cookie Plugin von Real Cookie Banner